I don't think that the comparison is with the perfect dog - I understand it to be against the average Labrador dog. So Charlie is more energetic than the average Labrador. I think that's pretty fair, almost generous, really - I'm grateful he got yellow and not red. If Charlie were to be compared to the perfect dog, he'd be red across the board, I reckon. Since nothing whatsoever about him is perfect. Well, apart from his cuddle skills. Most of the results posted by forum members show mainly green (about average or below average - leaving aside a few yellows we can't understand) and a smattering of yellows. That seems to me to be about what we'd expect for a Labrador compared to an average Labrador?